Blogs

Give a man a fish......

By Bill Hughes posted 03-22-2012 16:52

  

Ronald Reagan stated, “We should measure welfare’s success by how many people leave welfare, not by how many are added.”  Social welfare programs are a necessity of a civilized society, yet care needs to be taken by that society not to create a dependent class of citizen who no longer seek employment, no longer seek self-sufficiency, and tend to settle for the subsidized squalor that our welfare system has a potential to create.  Our own federal wildlife agencies prevent us from feeding animals in the wild so as to inhibit an animal’s natural ability to find food on their own, but when it comes to our own citizens, the same government has created layers upon layers of programs that can have the same inhibiting effect on one’s desire and ambition to care for themselves and their families.

We have all seen how children who are given everything grow into spoiled adults who are granted the “failure to launch” status by helicopter parents.  We are keenly aware of the disservice that is done to a child to be supplied their every need, yet we are not so aware of what we do to our fellow man by creating a dependent class.

We give housing, transportation, food, health care, day care, et. al, not only to those who need it, but also to those who could succeed without these things, if they were not so dependent upon them.  There is nothing wrong with someone desiring things, but when someone’s wants become more important than someone else’s, the rights of the others are trampled.  If someone elevates their desires as being more important than others, the result breeds an arrogant, ego-driven, childish person.

This type person usually lacks in kindness, understanding, charity and compassion.  Their world becomes wrapped in “what have you done for me lately”, and life becomes cheapened.  When one always looks to others to gain what they should provide for themselves, individuality, self respect and moral dignity is lost along the way.

Our leaders tell people that the reason they are doing without is because someone else has in essence “stolen” their money and material possessions.  People are told that the only reason they are poor is because others are so rich.  People are told that they are being mistreated if they have a smaller, older car, live in a poorer part of town or don’t have the creature comforts of those better off than them.  How far of a stretch is it to imagine the entitlement mentality going and taking what they want when they are continuously told these things?

Another harmful effect of building an entitlement class is that we take away the learning process of people.  Life has its struggles, and if we take away the struggles, people do not learn how to cope in times of stress and trouble.  Innovation, creativity and drive are taken away when we supply everything to someone as a lifestyle. 

Charities are neglected by those paying taxes because we feel that we have given enough through our taxes.  We know that there are so many agencies created to help others through our taxes that we lose our duty to help others out of our bounty.  The entitlement state has “delivered” the rest of society from our guilty feelings of lack of charitable giving.  I am not advocating doing away with help where help is truly needed, but we are turning what should be a safety net into a mattress.

4 comments
127 views

Permalink

Comments

03-26-2012 17:57

I just got around to reading your blog and wanted to respond with some thoughts. I think at this very point in time we are writing history. I don’t know where it will go and what policies will change that but as you very well know it is difficult to know what the end-effect our decisions will have. I look at the enormity of the decisions we make every day as leaders and the effect is has on my 50 employees, 200 of their immediate family and hundreds if not thousands of their secondary family and friends. I can’t even imagine the burden that is placed on the government at hand with the local, national, international and widely varying issues they are discussing and deciding. I have thought and prayed about our current state to a minute level and it scares me.
The problems we are facing are not about entitlement programs or “spoiled adults” it’s about the individual decisions we make. The decisions as CEO’s about our employees and customers. The decisions as parents as to what we teach our kids. Every decision has a domino effect and must be thought out carefully and considerably. Some choose to make those decisions with the bottom dollar in mind (or stakeholders as we learn in business school) and some with only think about what will benefit themselves and, yes, many think about the big picture: employees, families, customers.
The “spoiled” adults, or i-generation as I like to call it, were born and raised (and it continues as grandparents) to be given every *darn* desire they have; this also is not a government position or issue. We are ingrained with working hard so our kids have it better than we did INSTEAD of helping our kids sacrifice and struggle and learn from it. This is how I raise my kids (with sacrifice and struggle) even though I was not raised that way. My daughter is 20, married and on probation for choices she made. I do not pay her bills or food but I love and listen to her when she’s down and try to tell her it will be better. I do not wish to enable her or my 15 year old.
Where and what leaders are saying this? “Our leaders tell people that the reason they are doing without is because someone else has in essence “stolen” their money and material possessions. People are told that the only reason they are poor is because others are so rich. People are told that they are being mistreated if they have a smaller, older car, live in a poorer part of town or don’t have the creature comforts of those better off than them. How far of a stretch is it to imagine the entitlement mentality going and taking what they want when they are continuously told these things?” These thoughts are of individuals and a society that has become almost barbaric and scrapping for any means necessary. What have we done to get here and how do we change it are the questions to be answered.
I don’t think the dems are saying they want to steal from those who have worked hard to get where they’re at but rather pay their proportional share. This doesn’t affect you or I and not even our doctors but the millionaires (and billionaires). And it’s not to going to help more entitled (though that is not the majority of our debt) but to pay for better schools, keep social security and Medicare going, keep a strong military, fix roads, etc.
The blog was so full of political/FOX news rhetoric I didn’t know if Rush himself wrote it.

03-23-2012 11:00

Bill, I agree with much of what you say. However recently the middle class has also been accused of 'class warfare' by uber-wealthy (aka the 1%). Mark Twain has a wonderful quote about how 'professionals' claim to work hard, but in reality, it's the manual laborers who are REALLY working hard. He said (much more eloguently than I'm parphrasing) that he'd take being an author over digging ditches any day (and apparently had done both jobs).
60 or 70 years ago, the owner of a company made approximately 4 times what his factory work worker made. Today, CEO's make 6 figure salaries and while staring salaries and benefits for workers' continue to decline. When a husband and wife both work full time, they should be able to support their family in a manner that let's them live in a safe neighborhood, feed and cloth the children and have a good educational system and good medical care. They should be able to pay for all that (if both work). But, unfortunately, we have a whole new group of 'working poor's. They should not have to look for charity, but they do. There wages and benefits should be able to allow them to pay for that lifestyle.

03-22-2012 17:25

Thanks Jessica - you should "blog" your thoughts on the subject. They were greatly put. I do agree it is more of a problem with the system than with those who truly need the help. I would never degrade those who truly need the help. I appreciate your comments!

03-22-2012 17:20

While we agree that the "social benefits" programs have to be overhauled, Bill, I disagree with you on some major points. You do raise some valid questions that I think need to be asked. However, I do think that we tend to focus more on the people who are abusing the "social benefits" programs, rather than those who are trying to use them the way there were intended. The system is also failing those people, and that's really (in my opinion) a much bigger issue. You can target the folks who are "entitled" all you want - and believe me, I know they're out there - but I honestly believe that if we can fix the system to do what it was intended to do (a hand up, not a hand out), then that corrected system will do some of the work of shaking out the folks who are abusing the system.
People are not just disincentivized to get off benefits, they are essentially penalized for any step they make to try to get ahead. If you manage to get a part-time job to try to pay for your child's school clothes or a few extra groceries, your monthly benefit is reduced and you probably lose your food stamp allowance as well. So you try to work more hours so that you make a little extra to pay for those things, and your benefits are reduced again, and so forth, until you are working 50 hours a week at a minimum wage job (or more likely, 28 hours each at two minimum wage jobs, so they don't have to give you benefits or overtime) and you're away from your children all day, and the day care/afterschool program costs almost as much as you make, and in the end, you've gotten yourself "off welfare," but your children are being cared for by other people, they still don't have enough to eat, you're never home to care for them and make sure that they're doing their homework/learning manners/etc/etc and you're actually in worse shape financially than if you stayed home (which is saying something, because the average monthly benefits are PITIFUL.)
I know that the popular image is of the person with Medicaid and welfare walking around in expensive sneakers, jewelry and an iPhone. But that really is not fair to all the hard-working, poor families (many of whom have a parent or child with major health problems/significant disabilities) who might be able to break out of the system if we could only figure out a way to fix it. These folks don't want to be pitied, looked down on or given handouts. They're ashamed of the benefits they receive, but don't have a choice.
I've lived it. I know.
Now, if I only ran the world, maybe I could fix it. ;)
But as always, Bill, thanks for the thought-provoking and (hopefully) conversation-provoking blog.